A proposal comes back for boring reasons: a section missing, a research question that is really a topic, an outline with no parts, no word on method. This review reads your document section by section and tells you what to fix, in order.
Review my document →Keep your section headings: that is what the locator works from. Nothing is sent to a server, the analysis runs in your browser, and the text stays on your machine.
Keep your headings: that is how each section gets located in your text.
Presence, length and the signals each section needs: a real question, numbered parts, dated context, named methods, sources.
Critical first, since those are the sections that cannot be assessed at all as they stand.
Any proposal that has to be approved before the writing starts: a thesis or dissertation proposal, a research plan, a project outline. The grid checks the eight sections such documents are normally expected to contain.
It never looks at your commas. It looks at whether a section exists, whether it is more than a token paragraph, and whether it carries what it is supposed to carry: a genuine question, numbered parts, named methods, real sources.
No, and any tool that claims to would be lying. We report readiness against a grid. The decision belongs to the person reading it.
No. Everything runs in your browser and nothing is uploaded to a server.
Updated on · Published by ProRédaction